A-level Business (7132) · Paper 2: Business 2
RA10 predicted paper · June 2027 · Set C · Mark scheme · Time allowed: 2 hours · Maximum mark: 100
Written by RA10 from a question-by-question analysis of the AQA 7132 papers 2020-2025 and the v2.0 specification. This is not an official AQA paper and does not contain real exam questions.
Question 1: Atlas Bricks plc
01.1 [2 marks]
Using Appendix A, calculate Atlas Bricks plc's capacity utilisation in 2024.
Answer
315 / 420 x 100 = 75%.
Mark allocation
- 1 mark: method.
- 1 mark: 75%.
Why we predicted this: Spec 3.4.2: last tested as an extended question in Paper 2 in 2024.
01.2 [3 marks]
Using Appendix A, calculate the change in Atlas Bricks plc's operating profit margin between 2023 and 2024, in percentage points.
Answer
2023: 22.3 / 186.0 = 12.0%; 2024: 13.7 / 171.0 = 8.0%; fall of 4.0 percentage points.
Mark allocation
- 1 mark: 2023 margin 12.0%.
- 1 mark: 2024 margin 8.0%.
- 1 mark: fall of 4.0 percentage points.
Why we predicted this: Spec 3.5.2: last tested as an extended question in Paper 2 in 2025; most recently elsewhere in 2024.
01.3 [4 marks]
Using Appendix B, explain how changes in interest rates have affected the demand for Atlas Bricks plc's products.
Indicative content
- Base rate rose from 3.5% to 5.25% - higher mortgage costs reduce demand for new homes; house builders started fewer homes (190k to 149k, -22%).
- Bricks are a derived demand - fewer homes started means fewer bricks ordered (output fell from 378m to 315m).
- Higher rates also raise house builders' borrowing costs, delaying projects.
- Marks: 1 knowledge, 1 application with data, 2 development.
Why we predicted this: Spec 3.1.3 / 3.7.5: last tested as an extended question in Paper 2 in 2025.
01.4 [9 marks]
Analyse the possible benefits to Atlas Bricks plc of mothballing its Lancashire works.
Indicative content
- Capacity utilisation is only 75% - closing the oldest works raises utilisation of the remaining works, spreading fixed costs over more output and lowering unit costs.
- The oldest works is probably least energy-efficient - large energy saving.
- Cuts fixed costs (staff, maintenance) helping to restore the operating margin (down to 8.0%).
- Mothballing rather than closing keeps the option to restart when interest rates fall and house building recovers.
- BUT restarting kilns is costly and slow; transport costs rise for customers in the North West; redundancy costs and loss of skilled staff.
Levels of response (AO1 3 / AO2 3 / AO3 3 (Paper 2: 2/3/4))
| Level | Marks | Descriptor |
|---|
| 3 | 7-9 | Good knowledge and understanding; well-developed application to the context; well-developed analysis with chains of reasoning that are relevant to the question. |
| 2 | 4-6 | Reasonable knowledge; some application; analysis is reasonably developed but may be one-sided or lack depth in places. |
| 1 | 1-3 | Limited knowledge; little application; analysis is simple, generic or descriptive. |
Why we predicted this: Spec 3.4.3 / 3.9.1: last tested as an extended question in Paper 2 in 2025.
01.5 [16 marks]
Using the data, to what extent should Atlas Bricks plc buy Hartley Bricks Ltd?
Indicative content
- For: Hartley's handmade/restoration niche is less dependent on new-house building - diversifies risk; higher value products.
- For: modern, energy-efficient works (35% less energy) - lower costs; 92% utilisation shows demand.
- Against: £48m for £4.1m operating profit = 8.5% return - similar to Atlas's own weak performance; payback over 11 years on profit.
- Against: Atlas already has spare capacity (75% utilisation) - buying more capacity in a downturn adds risk; finance may require borrowing at high interest rates.
- Integration risks: culture of a small craft business v large plc; key craftsmen may leave.
- Judgement: depends on finance source, expected recovery of house building, synergies and whether Atlas can keep Hartley's niche expertise.
Levels of response (AO1 2 / AO2 3 / AO3 4 / AO4 7)
| Level | Marks | Descriptor |
|---|
| 4 | 13-16 | Well-developed, balanced analysis applied to the context, with a well-supported judgement that weighs the arguments and considers what the answer depends on. |
| 3 | 9-12 | Reasonably developed analysis, some balance, and a judgement with some support. |
| 2 | 5-8 | Some analysis, possibly one-sided; judgement is asserted rather than supported. |
| 1 | 1-4 | Limited knowledge and analysis; little or no judgement. |
Why we predicted this: Spec 3.9.1 / 3.7.8: last tested as an extended question in Paper 2 in 2023; most recently elsewhere in 2025.
Question 2: Kindred Care
02.1 [9 marks]
Analyse how Kindred Care's talent development programme may have helped it to achieve its objectives.
Indicative content
- Paid qualifications and a career path meet esteem and self-actualisation needs/motivators - labour turnover fell from 34% to 22%.
- Lower turnover cut agency staff costs from £940k to £510k - more surplus to reinvest in homes (social enterprise objective).
- Qualified staff (41% to 68%) provide better care - supports the mission of 'care with dignity' and reputation with families and the council.
- Continuity of staff improves relationships with residents.
- BUT costs of training; qualified staff may leave for better-paid NHS roles; other factors (pay, sector-wide changes) may explain improvements.
Levels of response (AO1 3 / AO2 3 / AO3 3 (Paper 2: 2/3/4))
| Level | Marks | Descriptor |
|---|
| 3 | 7-9 | Good knowledge and understanding; well-developed application to the context; well-developed analysis with chains of reasoning that are relevant to the question. |
| 2 | 4-6 | Reasonable knowledge; some application; analysis is reasonably developed but may be one-sided or lack depth in places. |
| 1 | 1-3 | Limited knowledge; little application; analysis is simple, generic or descriptive. |
Why we predicted this: Spec 3.6.1 / 3.6.2: last tested as an extended question in Paper 2 in 2025; most recently elsewhere in 2024.
02.2 [9 marks]
Analyse how stakeholder mapping could help Kindred Care's board manage the proposed closure of Elm House.
Indicative content
- Map stakeholders by power and interest: local council (high power - funds places; high interest) - manage closely; families and residents (high interest) - keep informed/consult; staff (high interest); local newspaper (power over reputation).
- Identifies who must be consulted early and who could block or damage the decision (council contracts, bad publicity).
- Helps prioritise communication resources and choose methods (meetings with families, consultation with staff representatives).
- Reduces conflict and protects reputation, supporting future funding.
- BUT positions change over time (newspaper campaign could raise families' power); mapping is subjective.
Levels of response (AO1 3 / AO2 3 / AO3 3 (Paper 2: 2/3/4))
| Level | Marks | Descriptor |
|---|
| 3 | 7-9 | Good knowledge and understanding; well-developed application to the context; well-developed analysis with chains of reasoning that are relevant to the question. |
| 2 | 4-6 | Reasonable knowledge; some application; analysis is reasonably developed but may be one-sided or lack depth in places. |
| 1 | 1-3 | Limited knowledge; little application; analysis is simple, generic or descriptive. |
Why we predicted this: Spec 3.2.3: last tested as an extended question in Paper 2 in 2023; most recently elsewhere in 2022. Stakeholder mapping appeared only as a 4-marker (2023); a 9-mark application is a natural step up.
02.3 [16 marks]
To what extent do all businesses benefit from having a mission that goes beyond making a profit?
Indicative content
- For: purpose attracts and motivates employees (values alignment), customers and investors who care about ethics - Kindred Care's mission supports recruitment and trust.
- For: guides decisions and long-term strategy; avoids short-termism; CSR reputation (Carroll's ethical/philanthropic levels).
- Against: may conflict with shareholders' demands for returns; higher costs; risk of 'purpose washing' if not genuine.
- Against: in highly price-competitive markets customers may not reward the mission; survival may require focus on profit first (Carroll's base).
- Depends on ownership (social enterprise v plc), industry, customers' values and how the mission is put into practice.
- Judgement: most businesses benefit if the mission is credible and compatible with financial sustainability - but 'all' needs qualification.
Levels of response (AO1 2 / AO2 3 / AO3 4 / AO4 7)
| Level | Marks | Descriptor |
|---|
| 4 | 13-16 | Well-developed, balanced analysis applied to the context, with a well-supported judgement that weighs the arguments and considers what the answer depends on. |
| 3 | 9-12 | Reasonably developed analysis, some balance, and a judgement with some support. |
| 2 | 5-8 | Some analysis, possibly one-sided; judgement is asserted rather than supported. |
| 1 | 1-4 | Limited knowledge and analysis; little or no judgement. |
Why we predicted this: Spec 3.7.1 / 3.1.1: never set as an extended question in Paper 2 (2020-2025); most recently elsewhere in 2024.
Question 3: Thread & Co
03.1 [2 marks]
What is meant by viral marketing?
Indicative content
- Marketing messages (often videos or posts) that are designed to be shared rapidly by consumers themselves through social media, spreading awareness at low cost.
Why we predicted this: Spec 3.3.4: last tested as an extended question in Paper 2 in 2024; most recently elsewhere in 2023.
03.2 [3 marks]
Using Table 1, calculate the value of returned items as a percentage of Thread & Co's revenue.
Answer
£7.7m / £28m x 100 = 27.5%.
Mark allocation
- 1 mark: figures selected.
- 1 mark: method.
- 1 mark: 27.5%.
Why we predicted this: Spec 3.5.2: last tested as an extended question in Paper 2 in 2025; most recently elsewhere in 2024.
03.3 [2 marks]
Using Table 1, calculate Thread & Co's market share of the 18-30 segment.
Answer
£28m / £1,650m x 100 = 1.7%.
Mark allocation
- 1 mark: method.
- 1 mark: 1.7%.
Why we predicted this: Spec 3.3.2: last tested as an extended question in Paper 2 in 2023; most recently elsewhere in 2025.
03.4 [9 marks]
Analyse how dynamic pricing might affect Thread & Co's profit.
Indicative content
- Prices rise when demand is high (viral video weeks) - captures more revenue per item and higher margins.
- Prices fall automatically on slow-moving lines - clears inventory before it goes out of fashion, reducing markdown losses and storage costs.
- Responds instantly to rivals' prices - protects sales volume in a price-sensitive market (young customers, elastic demand).
- Software and data costs; risk of customer resentment if prices change between visits - may damage loyalty and increase returns/abandoned baskets.
- Net effect on profit depends on PED, accuracy of the algorithm and how customers perceive fairness.
Levels of response (AO1 3 / AO2 3 / AO3 3 (Paper 2: 2/3/4))
| Level | Marks | Descriptor |
|---|
| 3 | 7-9 | Good knowledge and understanding; well-developed application to the context; well-developed analysis with chains of reasoning that are relevant to the question. |
| 2 | 4-6 | Reasonable knowledge; some application; analysis is reasonably developed but may be one-sided or lack depth in places. |
| 1 | 1-3 | Limited knowledge; little application; analysis is simple, generic or descriptive. |
Why we predicted this: Spec 3.3.4: last tested as an extended question in Paper 2 in 2024; most recently elsewhere in 2023.
03.5 [16 marks]
To what extent is choosing the right position on a market map the key to success for all retailers?
Indicative content
- For: market mapping shows gaps and where competitors are crowded - a clear position (e.g. affordable trend fashion for 18-30s) targets the right customers and supports pricing.
- For: positioning drives the whole marketing mix and brand identity.
- Against: execution matters more - supply chain speed, returns costs, customer service and digital marketing decide success (Thread & Co's returns are 27.5% of revenue).
- Against: gaps may exist because they are unprofitable; positions are easy to copy; markets change quickly (fashion).
- Against: financial management, location (for physical stores), and operational efficiency.
- Judgement: positioning is necessary but not sufficient; its importance is greater in crowded markets and for new entrants.
Levels of response (AO1 2 / AO2 3 / AO3 4 / AO4 7)
| Level | Marks | Descriptor |
|---|
| 4 | 13-16 | Well-developed, balanced analysis applied to the context, with a well-supported judgement that weighs the arguments and considers what the answer depends on. |
| 3 | 9-12 | Reasonably developed analysis, some balance, and a judgement with some support. |
| 2 | 5-8 | Some analysis, possibly one-sided; judgement is asserted rather than supported. |
| 1 | 1-4 | Limited knowledge and analysis; little or no judgement. |
Why we predicted this: Spec 3.3.3 / 3.8.2: last tested as an extended question in Paper 2 in 2025.