Mark Scheme — Predicted Paper 2

BTEC Level 3 AAQ IT Unit 2: Cyber Security & Incident Management • Total 90 marks

General marking guidance

Question 1

1(a)(i) Describe how an SQL injection attack works. (4 marks)

1(a)(ii) Explain one method of preventing SQL injection. (3 marks)

Accept: input validation/sanitisation, web application firewall.

1(b) Difference between DoS and DDoS. (4 marks)

1(c) Explain two security risks of BYOD. (6 marks)

1(d) Two GDPR responsibilities. (6 marks)

Question 2

2(a) Why default passwords should be changed. (4 marks)

2(b) Evaluate WPA2 vs WPA3. (9 marks)

Indicative content:

  • Handshake: WPA2 uses Pre-Shared Key (PSK); WPA3 uses Simultaneous Authentication of Equals (SAE).
  • Encryption: both use AES; WPA3 can use longer keys (up to AES-256); WPA3 more resistant to offline/dictionary attacks.
  • Compatibility: WPA3 is newer (2018); older devices/OSs may not support it; guest devices may only support WPA2.
  • Judgement: WPA3 is more secure but compatibility with older devices must be considered.

2(c) Benefit of network segmentation. (4 marks)

2(d)(i) Two DHCP configuration items. (2 marks)

2(d)(ii) One method of attacking via DHCP. (4 marks)

Accept: DHCP starvation — rogue client makes repeated requests to exhaust the address pool.

Question 3

3(a) How Plan-Do-Check-Act supports improvement. (6 marks)

3(b)(i) One advantage of a password manager. (3 marks)

3(b)(ii) One disadvantage of a password manager. (3 marks)

3(c) DPO responsibilities and external contractors. (6 marks)

3(d) Backup policy testing and storage strategy. (6 marks)

Question 4

4(a) Why a physical image rather than a targeted image. (4 marks)

4(b) Process for creating a forensic image. (4 marks)

4(c) Which log file contains evidence. (4 marks)

4(d) Avoiding false positives. (4 marks)

4(e) Report structure and improvements. (4 marks)

Levels-Based Mark Scheme (for 9-mark Evaluate questions)

LevelMarkDescriptor
00No rewardable material
11–3Basic application, one side only; superficial analysis; superficial/unsupported conclusion
24–6Good application, both sides; good analysis; partially supported conclusion
37–9Comprehensive balanced application; thorough analysis; well-supported conclusion